27 Reply of the Supreme People’s Court on the issue of how to control the execution of a new offence of delinquency or the term of imprisonment during the period of control. July 27, 1981 [1981] Law of the People’s Republic of China No. 18 Criminal Law has been stipulated japan property agency. 28 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office’s reply on how to determine the execution of the sentence after the sentence was reduced. The June 14 japan property agency, 1994 has been replaced by the Supreme People’s Court’s Regulations on the Specific Application of Laws for the Reduction of Criminal and Parole Cases. 29 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office has been sentenced to a life imprisonment for criminals who have been sentenced to life imprisonment and then sentenced to life imprisonment after retrial and sentenced to life imprisonment. On December 25, 1995, the Supreme People’s Court handled the case of commutation and parole. The provisions of the specific application of the law are replaced japan property agency. 30 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office’s telephone reply on the issue of how to sentence a prisoner to imprisonment during a probation sentence for imprisonment should be stipulated in the Criminal Law of September 17, 1984. 31 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office’s telephone reply to the criminal law on the issue of how the criminals sentenced to probationary probation were guilty of new crimes during the test period conflicted with the criminal law on March 24 japan property agency, 1988. 32 The Supreme People’s Court on the trial of life imprisonment offenders after the trial of the original court found that the original judgment was wrong japan property agency, the original judgment of the sentence should be revoked. The law of January 3, 1989, the law (Research) Fu [1989] No. 2 has been The Supreme People’s Court has replaced the provisions on the specific application of laws for commutation and parole cases japan property agency. 33 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office’s telephone reply on how to handle the commutation of the sentence after the sentence was commuted and the sentence was reduced. On April 5, 1990, the Supreme People’s Court applied the law on the application of commutation and parole. The provisions of the “replacement.” 34 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office on the original sentence of life imprisonment criminals after the commutation of the sentence and how to deal with the issue of commutation of the telephone call reply on January 20, 1992 has been the “Supreme People’s Court on the specific application of law on commutation and parole cases” instead. 35 The Supreme People’s Court Research Office’s telephone reply on whether the death penalty and life imprisonment criminals have been commutated several times after the commutation of the sentence has been abolished. On April 1, 1992, the Supreme People’s Court has specifically handled the cases of commutation and parole. Replace the provisions of the applicable law. 36 Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues.
http://www.daikyo.com.hk/en/buy/mansion/z?featureArea=true